Tuesday 8 September 2015

Min Pulse Width

Min pulse width check is to ensure that pulse width of  clock signal is more than required value. 

Basically it  is  based on frequency of operation and Technology.  Means if frequency of design  is 1Ghz than typical value of each high and low pulse width will be equal  to (1ns/2) 0.5ns if duty cycle is 50%.

Normally we see that in most of design duty cycle always keep 50% otherwise designer can face issues like clock distortion and if in our design  using half cycle path means data launch at +ve edge and capturing at -ve edge and again min pulse width as rise level and fall level will not be same and if lots of buffer and inverter will be in chain than it is possible that pulse can be completely vanish. 

Also we have to consider the best and worst case when clock get routed and depend on that decide that what should be the required value of Min Pulse Width. 

Now we know that  rise delay and fall delay of  combinational cells  are not equal so if a clock entering in a buffer than the output of clock pulse width will be separate to input.
So for example, if buffer rise delay is more than fall delay than output of clock pulse width for high level will be less than input.

so,  
High pulse : 0.5-0.056+ 0.049 = 0.493 & 
Low pulse :   0.5-0.049+0.056 = 0.507

For better understanding we go with real time scenario for Min Pulse Width.

Normally for clock path we use clock buffer because of the equal rise delay and fall delay of these buffer compare to normal buffer but this delay is not exact equal thatswhy we have to check min pulse width.

We can understand it with an example :-

Lets there is a clock signal which is going to clock pin of  flop through series of buffers with different rise and fall delay.  we can calculate  that how it effect to high or low pulse of clock.
we can  understand through calculation:-

High pulse width  = 0.5 + (0.049 - 0.056) + (0.034 – 0.039) + (0.023 –     0.026)  + (0.042 – 0.046) + (0.061 – 0.061) + (0.051 – 0.054) = 0.478ns

Low Pulse width = 0.5 + (0.056 – 0.049) + (0.038 – 0.034) + (0.026 – 0.023)  + (0.046 – 0.042) + (0.061 – 0.061) + (0.054 – 0.051) = 0.522ns

Lets required value of Min pulse width is 0.420ns.
Uncertainty =  80ps
than high pulse width = 0.478-0.080 = 0.398ns
Now we can see that we are getting violation for high pulse as total high pulse width is less than Require value.
So for solving this violation we can add an inverter which will change the transition and improve it.

2 comments:

  1. Hi, I got a question about the uncertainty.
    Does this 80ps represent the uncertainty between negedge of posedge of the clock?
    This should represent only the duty uncertainty of the clock, right?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi, By the above page I understand that min pulse width will calculate for Half cycle paths. But in Real projects why we calculate min pulse width for full cycle paths ?
    And second Question is what is the use of Half cycle paths ?

    ReplyDelete